The way you do it also scarces me a
little because I find it hard to judge how stable vocabularies like
those of
donnafales.com or holygoat.co.uk are.
The former I don't know, but the latter is probably the most widely
used RDF tagging vocab that there is - Richard Newman is very
unlikely to make any incompatible changes to it.
And what if there where two slightly
different vocabularies for recipes that I both liked and that both
had their
merits? Which one would I chose and what would happen to the other
one?
Good luck finding another RDF recipe vocab with merit. Good luck
finding another RDF recipe vocab at all!
* define mappings from this vocabulary to other, existing vocabularies
through OWL, eg
hRecipe:title owl:equivalentClass dc:title
The problem with this is that only tools that support OWL will
realise that hRecipe:title is the item's title. This leaves the
majority of simple RDF tools out in the cold.
That makes things more memorable, and easier to
identify e.g. when scanning source code.
If you want to make the properties you're using for recipes more
obvious, you could always use:
xmlns:recipe="http://donnafales.com/2002/07/28/recipe-schema#";
xmlns:recipeDC="http://purl.org/dc/terms/";
xmlns:recipeTag="http://www.holygoat.co.uk/owl/redwood/0.1/tags/";
<h1 property="recipeDC:title">...</h1>
... etc ...
Anyway, this is probably becoming off-topic for uf-discuss. Perhaps
we should shift over to the SWIG mailing list?
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
