On 12/16/08, Martin McEvoy <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for the clarification, the wiki page has had that definition for > 2 and a half years. > > Makes me think how much more information on the wiki is wrong or > misleading?
--- it is no worse than the web in general, or articles or books written. The benefits of the wiki is that we can spot issues and anyone can correct them. I am sure (and positive) Wikipedia and others have incorrect information, some will go unnoticed for awhile, but a wikis actually have the ability to be updated, whereas other sources do not. So +1 for wikis and community editing. It is just a matter of always going back to the source when possible. (I personally can't read some languages this wiki has been translated too, so everyone always need to confirm their sources, I´m sure there are issues on those pages as well - that's the nature of the web. We can't believe everything we read online - no matter how convincing the conspiracy theorists might sound) -brian -- brian suda http://suda.co.uk _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
