On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:56 PM, JMesserly <[email protected]> wrote: > I dropped a word- I meant to write > >> I will interpret lack of >>further<< responses to the two inquiries as >> acknowledgment that the techniques described are regarded as acceptable in >> the microformats community.
JMesserly, that may not be a reliable conclusion as: 1. The microformats wiki is definitive, the email lists are only "informative". http://microformats.org/wiki/mailing-lists#Use_the_wiki_to_share_state_instead_of_email http://microformats.org/wiki/wiki-better-than-email 2. Absence of objections should not be considered approval http://microformats.org/wiki/logical-flaws#Absence_of_objections_is_not_approval > I did not intend to pre-empt anyone's further comments and in fact > would like to hear any additional opinions one way or the other. I think there are still many ways of looking at the one event vs multiple events question, and thus you will likely see several comparably valid interpretations. Perhaps consider adding an instance of the examples you have with markup to the hCalendar examples page (maybe in a new section) http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar-examples And from there further discussion/iteration can occur. In addition, I have logged a summary of the original issues/question of "is dtends for yyyy or yyyy-mm ok" here: http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar-issues#2009 Please feel free to add more details/links of your question/issue there as well to make sure we capture it properly. Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
