On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Tantek Çelik <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Simon<[email protected]> wrote: > > I just wondered if there is any progress on hAtom. > > There are many open questions on the issues page, but nothing really happend > > since version 0.1. > > Hi Simon, apologies for the delay - been a bit busy with organizing > microformatsDevCamp[1]. > > > First all, thanks very much for adding to the notes on hAtom issues > and proposed resolutions: > > http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom-issues > > This is precisely one of the first things we need to do to update hAtom: > > * proposed resolutions to all outstanding issues with at least some > amount of consensus. > > Next we will need to take a look at any hAtom brainstorming that has > occurred since hAtom 0.1 and consider each brainstorm to see if it > makes sense to include in hAtom 0.2 or not. > > Finally, we'll need an editor (hopefully David Janes, but he's agreed > to let me co-edit in the event he is too busy to do so) to incorporate > these changes in 0.2.
I'm in to help. I've been hesitating because the uF process sometimes gives me indigestion, but I think it's time we hit this one. Regards, etc... David _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
