Tim's Trees wrote: > I came across the following script, but I can not get it to be > recognised as a microformat, by my browsers Chrome and Firefox, with > the normal microformat extensions. Other microformats I have tried > were recognised. The offending code is
I was able to get Operator to acknowledge the microformat in your sample. One thing that I did notice is that it didn't work until I corrected the 'fancy' quotes around your URL to simple 'straight' quotes. I don't know if the 'fanciness'(i.e. typographic quotes with different characters for close and open) was inserted by your email client or if it was present in your original source-code, but it's something you might like to check. By the way, my understanding is that setting 'display: none' on microformatted data will probably be frowned on. I don't think it's the cause of your problem (although I suppose an extension could assume that 'display: none' indicated that the author didn't want a piece of data to be taken into account) but if my reading of: http://microformats.org/wiki/principles is correct, hiding microformatted data is discouraged. Angus _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
