Hi. Lately there have been lots of questionable edits to the hcard-examples-in-wild page. I don't mean outright spam edits, which happen there about as often as on the rest of the wiki. The linked pages do technically have hCards on them. But there are many links from hcard-examples-in-wild to pages of dubious utility. Some examples:
* http://www.newtosandiego.com/Ocean-Beach-People's-Organic-Foods-Co-op/ * http://howdoyouknowifyouhavebedbugs.com/ * and many more along those lines. I suspect some "SEO specialists" have adopted hCard on spammy pages like these precisely so they can link to them from our (high PageRank) wiki. Personally, I think we should more heavily curate, or maybe even remove, this page. Back when hCard was new, having real-world examples was helpful to implementors. These days, hCards are on hundreds of millions of web pages. We can meet the needs of implementors by having a much smaller list of examples. Thoughts? Ted _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
