On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Stephen Paul Weber <singpol...@singpolyma.net> wrote: > As far as microdata, that's sort of a seperate thing. Microdata is in flux > and there are no community-driven vocabularies or formats for it (there are > some WHATWG-driven and Google-driven formats, but that's hardly a community > consensus).
Interesting. This seems pretty official: <http://www.schema.org/> But, like you say, it's hardly a community consensus. :( Purely from a readability perspective, I like that microdata is not using CSS classes; on the other hand, I'm not keen about pointing towards a schema (itemtype=) for every little piece of content on my page. Clearly there are advantages and disadvantages to both techniques. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
