Hello everybody, Martin, what you are writing is at least partially antrue. I did not bother. I simply asked a question. If you did misunderstand so it is your fault, not mine.
The second thing. Id did not know until now, that you are the God to tell all people in the world, that microformats are daed. AFAIK microformats was not developed by one person but by a community. BTW also SGML which was created long before, is just used today by some companies. So why bother? They do have the right to do this, no reason at all. OK, not to seem ungrateful, so what remains? The hint to microdata. Thanks for that. Wish all of you a happy Easter, live long and prosper and may the force be with you. ;-) Best regards, Thomas -- --[ Thomas Hofmann, Dorfen, tho...@th-o.de ]-- On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Martin Leese <martin.le...@stanfordalumni.org> wrote: > Thomas Hofmann wrote: > >> after some time out of the list I'm returning. >> Today I have an issue with some thougths. Is there a idea for >> developing some markup for FAQ or some kind of intervieww with >> question and answer? > > Why bother? Microformats has been > superseded by Microdata. Microdata is > supported by W3C; visit: > http://www.w3.org/TR/microdata/ > > Although Microdata requires HTML5, this it no > longer a barrier as there is now a ratified > standard for HTML5. > > According to my records, the last time anyone > posted to this list was in April 2013, two years > ago. That is a strong hint that Microformats > are dead. > > Regards, > Martin > -- > Martin J Leese > E-mail: martin.leese stanfordalumni.org > Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/ > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > microformats-discuss@microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss