Hello, thanks for your answers.
The problem most people in the discuss list had, was that you would
define relationships to customers and business related entities using a
"Friends network". This would most likely hold people back in adoption
of using a standard to define those relationships. The link to the
previous discussion in discuss:
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-January/008327.html
and:
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2007-January/008373.html
Cheers,
Kilian
Hi.
I think it's just about a name change since business relationship
and "friends" doesn't really fit. So if I got that right, we should add
more relationships to XFN and at the same time change the name
to reflect the new types of relationships available.
While I personally think adding relationships is a good idea, I'm
not convinced a name change to XRN is required.
- Alex
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
