my point is simply that yes, it´s probably useful to embed haudio inside hvideo. I am just arguing the implicit meaning: anything embeded in an hvideo should describe what the video is. To use the nesting to acquire a new meaning might not be so useful.
The difference would be: If I make a movie using footage from other different sources the hMovie nesting should work more like the "credits" for my movie and less a "chapter selection", or "dvd scene index" Therefore I agree that there is a need for nesting and there is a need for collections, but they might not be always the same On 4/17/07, Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexandre Van de Sande wrote: > On 4/15/07, Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your example of kill bill is a great illustration. A hMovie describing > kill bill is not a collection of songs, hcards and small movies (the > Oren Ishii animation for example, where it's told the chinese girl's > childhood, could be described as a separate movie), but one big movie > made from all those. The difference is not so clear when everything is > hAudio or hMovie, but can be seen on the aforementioned examples.. Could you clarify your point Alexandre? I don't know if you are saying that it is a good idea to embed hAudio in hVideo... or if you are saying it is a bad idea to embed hAudio in hVideo. I believe there are valid uses for both hAudio in hAudio and hAudio in hVideo. We shouldn't assume what the combinations would be used for and rule anything out. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
_______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
