On 02/05/07, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<div class="haudio">
<ol class="collection">
<li>
<span class="item">
<span class="work-title">
<a href="http://link-to-download/1"; rel="acquire">Track_1</a>
</span>
</span>
</li>
<li>
<span class="item">
<span class="work-title">
<a href="http://link-to-download/2"; rel="acquire">Track_2</a>
</span>
</span>
</li>
<li>
<span class="item">
<span class="work-title">
<a href="http://link-to-download/3"; rel="acquire">Track_3</a>
</span>
</span>
</li>
</ol>
</div>
It'd be a bit lighter with the "item" on each li in this example, eh? :)
I like this though. Again, looking at this newly - why isn't audio
being used as a subclass of "media"? The above example using
collections could just as easily be talking about a collection of
photographs, for example. I saw a quick flash of a mention about
media formats in the audio proposal, but not much else about why it's
not part of it, instead of just similar work.
--
Frances Berriman
http://fberriman.com
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
