actually i think that should be one of: <abbr class="duration" title="PT00:03:30" (3 minutes 30 seconds, 8601 "combined" format) title="P3M30S" (3 minutes 30 seconds, 8601), title="P3.5M" (3½ minues, 8601), title="P210S" (210 seconds, 8601) or title="210" (plain 210 seconds, not 8601)
3m 30s</abbr>
note the initial 'P'. that differentiates it from the interval syntax in 8601, e.g. T12:00:00/T12:03:30 (an interval starting at noon and ending 3 minutes 30 seconds later, timezone unspecified and assumed to be either UTC/GMT or localtime, depending on the application) On 5/3/07, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 19:06 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 08:39 -0700, Ben Wiley Sittler wrote: > > allow 8601 duration notation (see e.g. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Duration ) but treat an unmarked > > number as seconds and you'll have power and flexibility while also > > using standards. because of its unambiguous form, you could even > > support seconds only for now, and add 8601 duration support later, but > > that runs the risk of horribly confusing the first generation of > > implementations with the second generation of data (as has happened > > with some other specs that have made this change.) > > > > notations for 3 hours ten seconds and three hundredths of a second: > > > > PT3H10.03S > > ^- duration notation > > PT03:00:10.03 > > ^- combined notation > > 10810.03 > > ^- pure seconds (not 8601 but too simple not to allow) > > > > -ben > > so this would be better to specify length > > <abbr class="duration" title="3.30">3m 30s</abbr> sorry typo title="3:00" ahem... > > maybe this needs to be added to > > http://microformats.org/wiki/measure-brainstorming > > > > > On 5/3/07, Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Andy Mabbett wrote: > > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > > Scott Reynen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > > > > > > > >> length -> new class="length", or defer in first draft > > > > > > > > Should be a measure format > > > > > > I agree... but we don't have a measure format yet and nobody seems to be > > > pushing that initiative forward. Most of the audio-info-examples never > > > specify units (seconds are assumed). > > > > > > >> price -> new class="price", or defer in first draft > > > > > > > > Should be a currency format > > > > > > It is in the current proposal: > > > > > > http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal#Price > > > > > > -- manu > > > _______________________________________________ > > > microformats-new mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > microformats-new mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
_______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
