On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 14:55 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: > Martin McEvoy wrote: > > <div class="haudio"> > > <h1 class="vcard"> > > <span class="contributor org">The Beatles</span> - > > <span class="fn">The White Album</span></h1> > > > > <div class="haudio vcard"> > > <h2 class="fn">Disc: 1</h2> > > <ol> > > <li class="sound">Back in the U.S.S.R. - <span > > class="duration">2:43</span></li> > > <li class="sound">Dear Prudence- <span class="duration">3:56</span></li> > > </ol> > > </div> > > <div class="haudio vcard"> > > <h2 class="fn">Disc: 2</h2> > > <ol> > > <li class="sound">Birthday - <span class="duration">2:42</span></li> > > <li class="sound">Yer Blues - <span class="duration">4:00</span></li> > > </ol> > > </div> > > </div> > > In a very generic sense, I see where you're going, Martin. > > However, keep in mind that what you've marked up is really a formatted > name. The sound markup is meant for "audio samples". hAudio has already > solved that problem in a more semantically compact and accurate way (by > using rel="sample", rel="enclosure", and rel="payment"). > > For solving the problem of albums, using the 'album/track' markup > previously proposed seems to make more semantic sense than this proposal.
Thought as much thank you Manu :) > > -- manu > _______________________________________________ > microformats-new mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
