On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 12:22 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: > There seem to be quite a number of good arguments one way or the other > concerning the use or mis-use of 'title', 'summary', 'description', and > other such pre-existing class names. > > Since we plan to embed haudio in other Microformats, it seems that we > should pick something that will not conflict with any of the other > already created Microformats. > > Trying to convince the list to re-use any of the pre-existing element > names has met with stiff opposition. > > I am proposing that we use 'audio-title' and leave it at that. I'll work > this into the haudio proposal at the end of this week unless there is > strong opposition to this proposal.
I know I sound awkward I preferred work-title if we are going to invent a new microformat. "work-title of an audio recording is a short textual description used to identify the work among interested parties. This is also referred to as the title of the work. This can be the title of a speech, song title, or short description regarding a sound effect." At least it's more likely to be re-used in other microformats -Martin- > > If you are strongly opposed to 'audio-title', please provide an > alternative in your argument against it. > > -- manu > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-new mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
