On 6/15/07, Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The final submission of the hAudio draft is on the wiki:
http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-proposal
Changes:
* Adopted 'audio-title' to specify the title of the recording
* Fixed a typo concerning contributor class
* Fixed all references from 'fn' to 'audio-title'
* Updated mailing list discussion page
* Added "Specification Development Statistics" section
We have successfully integrated haudio with several of our client sites
which will be going live in the next 2-3 weeks. We are also currently
authoring the haudio Operator plugin (which should be compatible with
Firefox 3 when it launches). We are also going to be working on
Wordpress plugins to aid hAudio in becoming adopted more rapidly in the
blogging community.
As of this point, all major concerns have been addressed. Please review
and send feedback to the list - if there is no feedback that changes the
draft significantly, this will be the last proposed version for this
round of the hAudio discussion.
(1)
Sorry to bring up this sore point, but why "audio-title" over "fn"? I
did see your feedback a couple of days ago about the concepts of
"audio-title" being different from "track-title", etc (I can't
remember the exact terms, but you get the point). However, it seems to
me that "fn" could be used to represent each of these _concepts_, as
the "fn" will be appropriately nested within identifying containers.
(2)
A little voice in my head says this is more general than audio...
Regards, etc...
--
David Janes
Founder, BlogMatrix
http://www.blogmatrix.com
http://blogmatrix.blogmatrix.com
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
