moving *parsing* discussion to microformats-dev, microformats-new bcc'd. please see http://microformats.org/wiki/mailing-lists for which topics are better for which lists.
On 6/19/07 7:14 AM, "David Janes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/19/07, Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is the heart of the problem. >> >> The Microformats community has adopted two mutually exclusive philosophies: >> >> 1. Scope-less approach to parsing. > > This is why I've been picking at this like a scab for the last week. I > don't think we've adopted #1 at all. "scope-less" is a mischaracterization and false. For example, root class names have always been used to indicate the root of a compound microformat. e.g. see: http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-parsing Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
