What is the process for mapping the hAudio Microformat to RDFa? The reason that we need to do this is because the hAlbum/hVideo specs that we've been researching internally have some nasty long-term design issues due to the no-namespace/scope-less approach that uFs have adopted.
We'd like to make hAudio a standard across "semantic languages". We don't want to go through the same arduous process that everybody had to go through on here concerning hAudio with another community... it would be a waste of everybody's time. The hard work (research, examples and analysis) was accomplished via the Microformats process. Implementing hAudio using the Microformats approach isn't going to work for complicated/nested audio/video/image structures. We have a very large database that we would like to semantic-ify and we would like to do it in a standards-compliant way. How can we propose an RDFa standard for hAudio that is scrutinized and adopted by this community? In other words - Microformats did a good job with the design. We'd like to give people the option to implement using either hAudio uF or hAudio RDFa. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
