Regine Heidorn wrote: >> You're talking about crawling, indexing and website implementation. >> While this community is interested in this stuff... they are >> implementation details that don't really have much to do with creating >> the Microformat you are talking about. > > That's true ... but nonetheless: do you have some good starting-point to > gather information or another hint for me?
If you mean gather examples, then just start collecting URLs to top-lists that you know of on the web. We can put them on the audio-info-examples page for now and move them into their own set of pages if necessary. I've made a section for you to start adding top-lists on the audio-info-examples page: http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Top_Lists Please feel free to add as many examples as you can. >> - What problem is 'top-list' attempting to address? >> - How many sites have "top-list" type information? >> - What kind of information should be placed in a top-list? >> - Is there any way that we can combine haudio + hreview to solve the >> problem? > > Phheewww ... seems a lot of work, don't know if I'm gonna get that far. > So first I'd like to develop the idea behind it, then let's see what it > brings. The combination of hAudio and hReview seems to fit my idea, so > maybe it ain't necessary to create an own format. You could loosely accomplish what you are trying to do with XOXO + hAudio, or XOXO + hReview, or XOXO + hReview + hAudio. The semantics wouldn't be rock-solid (it would be difficult to get Firefox 3 to understand that when it sees those two or three things together, it is a top-list instead of a playlist). -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
