Scott Reynen wrote: > On Oct 15, 2007, at 8:57 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: > >> The corrected value should be: >> >> title="PT268S" >> >> OR >> >> title="PT4M46S" >> >> That field must follow the ISO-8601 standard. > > I think the current consensus around ISO 8601 is that we should use the > most human-readable valid syntax. Of the two above, the latter appears > to be more readable. However, I think the following may also be valid > ISO 8601 duration syntax: > > title="PT04:46"
I haven't been able to find anything to support that mark-up (I tried looking for about 30 minutes). Here are the pages that I found (none of which use the mark-up you specified above): http://www.ostyn.com/standards/scorm/samples/ISOTimeForSCORM.htm http://www.stylusstudio.com/w3c/schema2/built-in-primitive-datatypes.htm#duration I also couldn't find it in the ISO-8601 specification (page 31 and 32): http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/4021199/ISO_8601_2004_E.zip?func=doc.Fetch&nodeid=4021199 There are no extended formats for time interval that I can see. Unless anybody else can find any evidence to the contrary, we should probably use the following format in the examples: title="PT4M46S" -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
