In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manu Sporny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>We should be using TITLE for the title of audio recordings. >So, who is going to make an argument against using TITLE in hAudio? I'm not, but I do think we should allow for distinction between the titles of tracks, albums, works and similar. This could take the form of: album-title track-title etc. or it could be: <foo class="album"> <fooclass="title"> Meddle </foo> </foo> <foo class="track"> <fooclass="title"> One of These Days </foo> </foo> The former, hyphenated, pattern could again borrow the DC "qualified" model, and be treated by parsers as equivalent to "title" for some purposes", but distinguished from each other, for other purposes. -- Andy Mabbett _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list microformats-new@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new