In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin McEvoy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 18:30 -0500, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> That is a very wise interjection... I agree, we should be asking "is
>> it
>> safe to say TITLE means title?"
>
>Yes it is.
>
>hcard "broke" itself when it was decided that "title" should be defined
>as "Job title or functional position of the object" its very specific
>and really only has something to do with a person when really should
>have been referring to the "object"
vCard effectively uses "job-title", but omits the "job-" prefix because
it is redundant /in that context/.
By way of illustration,
Lord Peter Piper, Chief Pepper Picker
has a title of "Lord" and a job-title of "Chief Pepper Picker" (though
vCard bundles titles and other honorific prefixes under the latter
designation).
If we remember that "title" in vCard is really job-title; we can use
"title" in hAudio to mean [album or track]-title; or we can be more
explicit, and use audio-title; or offer a choice of album-title,
track-title etc.
I favour the latter, for its enhanced semantics.
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
