On Feb 15, 2008, at 9:42 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
On Feb 15, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
For my 2¢, I think the ‘audio-title’ route is OK
I agree. I was just looking back over how we got here on this
issue, and I'm afraid it may be largely my fault. When AUDIO-TITLE
was widely accepted, Brian said "what about FN?" and then Manu
raised an issue with FN and then I suggested a resolution for that
issue, and Manu agreed. So we moved forward with FN, but in
retrospect I think it was a mistake to treat the resolution of one
issue with FN as a reason to go with FN over AUDIO-TITLE without
ever really comparing the alternatives. I never saw a problem with
AUDIO-TITLE. I think I just got so into defending FN that I stopped
openly considering the alternatives. Now that I reconsider them, I
agree with Ben that AUDIO-TITLE looks OK.
This sounds like a good way forward to me. Any reason why audio-title
shouldn't be reconsidered?
-ryan
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
