On 19 Apr 2008, at 12:53, gabriele renzi wrote:
looking at the kelkoo output, I see
<li class="result hlisting cat-123 prod-1234 offer
offer-manufacturer_products first" id="..">
<div class="information-container">
<ul class="information">
<li class="photo">
<a href="..">
<img alt="" src="..."/>
</a>
</li>
...
Am I right in assuming that "photo" is an optional field of the
Listing, which was formerly described as being a sub-filed of listing
item ?
Furhermore, am I right in assuming that the parsing rule would be
get @src from a IMG tag under .photo ?
Alas, that is an error I made on Kelkoo. Under the current draft
schema, ‘photo’ should be a property of ‘item’ and we got that wrong.
I think we've got an open bug at Yahoo! to fix that, and I'll check
the status of it on Monday.
I do wonder about allowing ‘photo’ under ‘hListing’, just to loosen it
up and maybe allow for photos the accompany the listing but which are
not necessarily of the item itself, but I'm unsure, and would probably
call that an optimisation. As such, shouldn't be considered until
later in the process.
B
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
