David Janes wrote:
Just so I get this straight, what's the official Wiki pages we're
using to capture all of this?
http://microformats.org/wiki/comment
;-)
Regards, etc...
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin McEvoy wrote:
Toby A Inkster wrote:
Why not rel=bookmark?
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/types.html#h-6.12
| Refers to a bookmark. A bookmark is a link to a key entry point within
| an extended document. The title attribute may be used, for example, to
| label the bookmark. Note that several bookmarks may be defined in each
| document.
http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-design-pattern#rel.3D.22bookmark.22
| By convention, this entry point also captures the notion of a
"permalink".
Agreed, I also feel that in order for a parser to extract comments only
from a page a different link type is needed for a comment, it will help
distinguish a comment from the article.
Having said that I am thinking re-use XFN rel-contact for this link type,
and use rel-bookmark for backwards compatibility with existing parsers eg:
<a rel="contact bookmark" href="#comment-001">link to this</a>
|contact could be parsed as the in-reply-to Atom Threading Extension
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4685).
Please see http://microformats.org/wiki/comment-brainstorming#Schema
Thanks
--
Martin McEvoy
http://weborganics.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
--
Martin McEvoy
http://weborganics.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
