On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Toby A Inkster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Janes wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Martin McEvoy <martin at >> weborganics.co.uk> wrote: >> >> * reply[1] (comment-link) 60% >> > o By adding "rel-reply" the author is indicating that the page >> > http://someblog/post#comment-001 is a reply for the referring page (see >> > example). > > > Martin, you've explained this a few times on the list, and I have to admit, > this is the first time I've "got it". Yes, this does make sense as a > solution. rel="reply bookmark" would be even better.
I withdraw my comment about semantic nonsense and apologize to Martin for my tone. I thought this was the in-reply-to proposal. However, how is the different than saying a comment is marked up as "hentry comment", which will work on close to 100% [1] of the exemplars instead of 60%? Regards, etc... [1] there are universal issues for all proposals with blogger DL lists -- David Janes Mercenary Programmer http://code.davidjanes.com _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
