Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:
Hi David,
Welcome to the list, and thanks for this innovative contribution!
I do have one concern, though. JSON sounds an awful lot like YAML and
(especially around here) XOXO:
http://www.yaml.org/
http://microformats.org/wiki/xoxo
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2005-September/001020.html
My preference would be to use XOXO as the transport, so that *all*
intermediate data is legal HTML. Would that be possible/desirable
within the JSON metaphor? If not, why not?
Hi Ernie,
JSON is the real deal -- there's lots of people using and many sites are
already supporting it (for example [1]). Furthermore, the technique
that JSON uses to load data -- dynamic script loading -- will only work
if the result is valid Javascript.
Regards, etc...
[1] http://del.icio.us/help/json
_______________________________________________
microformats-rest mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-rest
