Isn't that what an XMDP profile in <head> is supposed to be for? Or
were you looking for something in the *HTTP* headers? Why? After
all, it is just supposed to be HTML, no?
-- Ernie P.
On Mar 21, 2006, at 1:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Are there any conventions for indicating whether content has a
microformat in it based upon HTTP headers? While the link tag can
be re-serialised as the Link HTTP header, that doesn't cover all
microformats.
The use case is microformat sniffing/modification/dispatching/etc.
by intermediaries; generally, they're really loathe to open up the
body. A flag in the headers (media type? separate header? etc.)
would get uF detection off of the critical path.
Yes, this makes things significantly more difficult for authors (at
least until we fix the tools!), but it would be very helpful to be
able to do it.
Otherwise, some best practice that made it possible to detect
whether some content embedded a uF within the first n bytes (say,
50) would be very helpful.
--
Mark Nottingham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
microformats-rest mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-rest
_______________________________________________
microformats-rest mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-rest
