On 12/12/06, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
One perennial topic of interest on this list is whether it is
possible to create a RESTful analogue of WSDL: a machine-parseable
description of the site's API.
FWIW personally I prefer convention over such a liberal specification.
For instance, the AtomAPI's introspection stuff paired with the
conventions that the AtomAPI implies (for example see
http://bitworking.org/rfc/draft-gregorio-07.html#rfc.section.5.1.1)
seems fine by me.
It's also worth noting, just FWIW, that Rails adopts a lot of the
conventions specified in AtomAPI w.r.t. accessing resources and
collections of resources.
-Bosko
--
Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.crowdedweb.com/
_______________________________________________
microformats-rest mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-rest
