Hey I looked through the Middlegen buglist and seems there are some bugs related to this:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=596249&group_id=36044&atid=415990 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=615463&group_id=36044&atid=415990 I see from a comment by Aslak that CMRs do not apply to remote beans at all. So I guess the fix to this would be something like this (I might be wrong here): local - Create methods with CMR fields linking to other local interfaces. remote - Create methods with just the fields (like flightId instead of flightLocal) Anyone has time to look into this? Involvement from more users would be really good I think, as the developers are really busy for the moment. Submitted patches/solutions are so much quicker to add than sitting down and figuring things out.. .eivind On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Russell Black wrote: > First, I want to say God Bless Middlegen!, and kudos to Aslak and the other >developers. This will be an enormous time saver if I can get it to do what I need. > > When I configure middlegen to generate remote interfaces (viewtype="remote" in the >cmp20 subtask), it generates create methods which take local interfaces as parameters. > > For example: a Choice belongs to a Scale, and the middlegen-erated create method in >ChoiceBean looks like this: > > public foo.interfaces.ChoicePK ejbCreate( int number, java.lang.String text, >boolean na, icoachplus.interfaces.ScaleLocal scale ) > > Resulting in an xdoclet-generated *remote* interface that looks like this: > > public foo.interfaces.Choice create(int number , java.lang.String text , boolean na >, icoachplus.interfaces.ScaleLocal scale) > > This causes two issues. First, since it didn't generate any local interfaces, it >won't compile. I can make it compile by using viewtype="both", but the real issue in >my mind is: what good is a create method on a remote interface that takes local >interfaces as parameters? A remote client of course does not have access to local >interfaces. > > I love the CMR feature introduced in EJB 2.0, so I want to use local interfaces >where I can, but I'd really like to be able to create objects with the remote >interfaces where running in the same JVM is not an option. > > Thanks, > > Russell > > >N隊X'u(uܨ nǫy˫܂'$~N)i^I"ƺ'^jwZ *. ZrH r)y>i((mifezǫx%fezǫ+-.ǟ allqzlX)ߣu^ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about your web server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte Apache SSL Guide and answer your Apache SSL security needs: http://www.gothawte.com/rd523.html _______________________________________________ middlegen-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/middlegen-user
