Most of our
table names are in singular form and we would like to keep those that are not
as-is: USERS for example since USER is a reserved table name. Moreover, we have
tables such as NEWS whose singularized variable and class name prefixes that are
coming out as "NewFoo" or "newFoo". I understand that the rules are pretty
simplistic and that a dictionary might help but I would prefer to stipulate that
the tables names are to be considered singular. Not to disable the whole naming
scheme but rather just to assume the input table names are singular.
Title: Message
- RE: [Middlegen-user] Can the singularization of table names... Rod Macpherson
- RE: [Middlegen-user] Can the singularization of table ... Aslak Hellesoy