Todd Daniel Woodward wrote:
> Well, I wasn't thinking so much about the current core
> (assuming you're talking about 1.2). I assumed the symlink
> discussed was for 2.x.
True, but the core isn't so much going to be doing different
things, just mostly the same things in a different way (which
allows for more flexibility).
> Trying to design a site with Midgard that is in some ways
> like 40 different sites (the markets like
> pittsburgh.radiodigest.com), with one MASTER site/page
> (www.radiodigest.com), that all share some articles in one
> way or another, but will be displaying them differently for
> different lenghs of time in different sort orders...looks
> daunting, if not code-expensive in the current version of
> Midgard.
Midgard or not, what you are going to do is pretty daunting in
itself :)
It would require some wrapper functions, and a little discipline
to get this to work with the current release. It's not certain
that symlinks will show up in the xmas release, as we're still
discussing on how to do them. Implementation and stable release
is going to take a little time.
> If I could have articles each with two complete sets of
> variables for date, score, etc., I could see how to do it.
For the current release, extra data indexed on table/object ID
is your best bet.
Bye,
Emile
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
