Henri Bergius wrote:
> Under the Finnish law, the possible disbanding is
> decided by a general meeting of the organization.
> Usually the regulations state that the assets
> of the organization are at that point donated
> onwards to advancement of the organization's goals.
>
> For us, that could mean that if the organization
> were disbanded, the copyrights could be donated
> to for example FSF.
Works for me. But I was thinking more in the line of
tangible assets. FSF works here too, I think.
> However, I think it is better to have nothing
> of where the donations should go at that event
> written down to the regulations, but rather let
> the general meeting decide that following some
> guidelines set by the rules.
I wasn't proposing picking a charity _now_ :) The
'advancement' clause is close enough for me.
> Of course, I'm operating here on the notion that
> we shouldn't be wanting to disband the organization
> anytime soon. :-)
*grin* of course. But no 'advancement' clause is required in .nl
and I've seen non-profits end in petty arguments over this thing.
Emile
--
This is The Midgard Project's mailing list. For more information,
please visit the project's web site at http://www.midgard-project.org
To unsubscribe the list, send an empty email message to address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
