Hi Jouni, Thanks for the clarification. That is ture GGSN/PGW is not mandate to do relay. "May" instead of "shall" is used to describe GGSN/PGW's action. The only mandate is to use RA to obtain /64 prefix.
Regards, Tao On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 12:43 AM, jouni korhonen <jouni.nos...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Nov 30, 2011, at 8:18 PM, Tao Sun wrote: > > > Forgot to include a website link in the previous email. Now I included > it. > > > > Regards, > > > > Tao Sun > > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Tao Sun <hisun...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Thanks for the discussion. As one of the author of the draft, I would > like to share our view on DHCPv6 used case in three aspects. > > *Network management and configuration. > > 1. It is efficient for the network to configure this in a central DHCPv6 > server to do unified routing policy configuration. The gateways (e.g., GGSN > in cellular network) only need to perform DHCPv6 relay. > > Just want to point out that 3GPP specs do not define/mandate DHCPv6 relay > function in GGSN/PGW.. It is a server when seen from the UE point of view. > > [snip] > > - JOuni > > > >
_______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
