Hello Fred,

Thanks for writing MIF iron document, 
Comments from MIF:
1) MIF is not targeting a new internetworking and routing architecture, MIF
is proposed to solve today existing industry's architecture such as 3GPP,
BBF, WIFI deployment or Ethernet/PON office network. For new architecture
proposal, it would better to be discussed in IRTF.
2) MIF is not going to solve one OS handling two interfaces with the same
conflict IP address and prefix. At this moment, it is talking about how to
select happy eyeball path with multiple interfaces.

Comments from research direction:
1) Thinking about the possibility how to deploy VSP integrated with the
existing architecture like 3GPP, BBF, WIFI. It will take a revolutionary way
other than incremental deployment since it will change both host and
network, host is especially harder in today's mobile industry by supporting
IRON interface.
2) As far as I learned, IETF is more focusing on the problem with the
limited scope other than a general solution which can solve everything like
1st paragraph of in section of Introduction.

Excuse me for not reading in detail about your 4 drafts.

Thanks again

-Hui

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 1:07 AM
> To: Hui Deng
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: FW: New draft: IRON Applicability for Multiple Interface Nodes
> 
> Hello Hui,
> 
> The draft I announced on Jan 4th (below) was motivated
> by our discussions back in December:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif/current/msg01597.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif/current/msg01599.html
> 
> I would appreciate it if you could take the time to
> review the draft and post comments.
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> [email protected]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Templin, Fred L
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 11:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [mif] New draft: IRON Applicability for Multiple Interface Nodes
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have submitted a new draft on "IRON Applicability for
> Multiple Interface Nodes" (see below). Please review and
> send comments.
> 
> Fred
> [email protected]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 10:18 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-templin-mif-ironapp-00.txt
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
> 
>       Title           : IRON Applicability for Multiple Interface Nodes
>       Author(s)       : Fred L. Templin
>       Filename        : draft-templin-mif-ironapp-00.txt
>       Pages           : 7
>       Date            : 2012-01-04
> 
>    The Internet Routing Overlay Network (IRON) is a new internetworking
>    and routing architecture that addresses important issues including
>    routing scaling, network renumbering, mobility management, mobile
>    networks, multihoming, traffic engineering, NAT traversal and
>    security.  In this document, we focus on IRON's applicability for
>    multiple interface (mif) nodes.
> 
> 
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-templin-mif-ironapp-00.txt
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-templin-mif-ironapp-00.txt
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif


_______________________________________________
mif mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

Reply via email to