Le 29/03/2012 14:22, Tomek Mrugalski a écrit :
On 12-03-29 13:35, Ted Lemon wrote:
Probably the best thing to do is set the router lifetime to the DHCP
renewal time, and not send a lifetime separate from that.
We are talking about two timers here: route lifetime and renewal time
(governed by information refresh time, defined in RFC4242). Will add
clarification text that route lifetime should be greater than
information refresh time. Making them equal is not a such good idea as
it could trigger race conditions. Otherwise badness will happen.
We may be talking three timers: route lifetime, router lifetime (ND) and
renewal time.
Alex
Tomek
_______________________________________________
mif mailing list
mif@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
