On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 21:20, Alexandru Petrescu < alexandru.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> W-1: When the router is attached to the WAN interface link, it MUST >> act as an IPv6 host for the purposes of stateless [RFC4862] or >> stateful [RFC3315] interface address assignment. >> > > That is not enough for specific routes. Ok it covers the default routes, > but not specific routes such as rfc4191. Sure. But RFC 6204 also doesn't say "must implement a DHCPv6 route option". So if you want to ensure that the CE router can configure more-specific routes, you have to modify RFC 6204 either way. In one case, you need to modify it to say "must implement a DHCPv6 route option". In the other, you need to modify it to say "must implement RFC 4191". Note that the RFC already says that "nodes that will be deployed in SOHO environments SHOULD implement RFC 4191", so RFC 4191 is likely already implemented.
_______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
