Hi, Behcet,

I would only like to see the presentation about how 4191 can not solve the
issue about multiple interfaces, not about proposal.
we can discuss it during the preparation time.

thanks

-Hui

2012/7/19 Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2...@gmail.com>

> Hi Hui,
>
> Please see inline.
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Hui Deng <denghu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello authors,
> >
> > I recall that there was discussion on this draft, but haven't finished,
> can
> > you help to clarify further on this?
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif/current/msg01785.html
> >
>
> We don't think that there is a problem with RFC 4191.
> However, latest developments like the advent of multiple interfaced
> smart phones and multi-homed hosts bring the need to add a few new RA
> options.
> That's all.
>
> Regards,
>
> Behcet
> > Best,
> >
> > -Hui
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/7/11 Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> A new version of I-D, draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-01.txt
> >> has been successfully submitted by Behcet Sarikaya and posted to the
> >> IETF repository.
> >>
> >> Filename:        draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route
> >> Revision:        01
> >> Title:           IPv6 RA Options for Multiple Interface Next Hop Routes
> >> Creation date:   2012-07-10
> >> WG ID:           Individual Submission
> >> Number of pages: 9
> >> URL:
> >>
> >>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-01.txt
> >> Status:
> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route
> >> Htmlized:
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-01
> >> Diff:
> >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-01
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >>    This draft defines new Router Advertisement options for configuring
> >>    next hop routes on the mobile or fixed nodes.  Using these options,
> >>    an operator can easily configure nodes with multiple interfaces (or
> >>    otherwise multi-homed) to enable them to select the routes to a
> >>    destination.  Each option is defined together with definitions of
> >>    host and router behaviors.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The IETF Secretariat
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mif mailing list
> >> mif@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
mif mailing list
mif@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif

Reply via email to