Hi, 2012/7/28 Ted Lemon <[email protected]>: > On Jul 27, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Arifumi Matsumoto wrote: > > Then, why not publish it as an experimental document in IETF ? > > > The objection to the draft was that if any draft ever describes a route > option for DHCP, the world will end. So that's not going to get consensus. > This was in fact roughly the level of reasoning that went on during the > discussion—many nightmare scenarios were described, assertions were made > that these scenarios were inevitable, and on that basis the proposal had to > be dropped. > > This has happened every time one of these proposals has been advanced. I > don't see any reason to think that it will ever stop; consequently, there is > no way that the IETF can ever gain consensus on this.
After re-reading the minutes, I found nobody complains about publishing this option as a standard track if its usage is limited to routers. Isn't it overkill the whole usage of this option ? _______________________________________________ mif mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
