On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Arifumi Matsumoto <[email protected]>wrote:
> So, in other words, this option just depends on the address selection > option. > If it is true, a work that depends on another work can be done separately > in > a separate wg. > Sounds reasonable. > I do not know whether mif is the right place for this proposal, but > generally speaking it is the right place where the scope and motivation > matche best. > I disagree that MIF is the right place. MIF is chartered to deal with multiple interfaces. "Allowing relay agents to modify DHCPv6 requests in flight" and "allowing relay agents to initiate DHCPv6 requests on behalf of clients" has nothing to do with multiple interfaces.
_______________________________________________ mif mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
