I've been following the recent discussion of draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option, including the issue of whether this work belongs in mif. As item 2 in the list of explicit WG deliverables defines the problem addressed in draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option, and that document has been accepted as a mif WG work item, it's appropriate for the mif WG to continue development of the document.
- Ralph _______________________________________________ mif mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
