#20: Use case #9 suggests changes to IPv6 deployment architecture
The text in use case #9 appears to create a new, different IPv6 deployment
architecture, one in which RAs are not required.
This suggests that perhaps (if this moves forward) we need to update the
IPv6 node requirements document to strongly recommend not just support of
DHCPv6 but specifically this option. Guidance to host implementations
that this will be required in some environments is probably critical.
--
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: ek@… | Owner: draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-
Type: defect | option@…
Priority: blocker | Status: new
Component: dhcpv6 | Milestone:
-route-option | Version:
Severity: - | Keywords:
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mif/trac/ticket/20>
mif <http://tools.ietf.org/mif/>
_______________________________________________
mif mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
