Hi Brian, I made this revision based on the feedback I got from my 6man presentation in Atlanta.
More inline: On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Brian E Carpenter < brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking again at this draft after some time, I think it lacks some > explanation of the scenario. > > In particular: > > > It should be noted that the proposed options in this document will > > need a central site-wide configuration mechanism. The required > > values can not automatically be derived from routing tables. > > I had added this text based on your comments. > What site is that? A mobile MIF node might find itself receiving RAs from > two completely different "sites" simultaneously, which are completely > uncoordinated. > > Appreciate if you could provide some text? Regards, Behcet > Regards > Brian > _______________________________________________ > mif mailing list > mif@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif >
_______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
