On 18/12/2014 04:48, Ted Lemon wrote: ... > What's the rationale for the third sentence in the paragraph below? > > In some network topologies, network infrastructure elements may need > to advertise multiple PvDs. Generally, the details of how this is > performed will be defined in companion design documents. However, > where different design choices are possible, the choice that requires > a smaller number of packets shall be preferred for efficiency. > > I ask because I think this is DISCUSS fodder: someone is going to want > details. If it's important, let's keep it and defend it. If it's more of > an aside, let's get rid of it.
Good catch, IMHO. I could easily imagine an argument that a smaller number of packets that for some reason need more complex processing would actually be less efficient. Let's not invite that argument - delete the sentence. Brian _______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
