> 2.2. Implicit PvDs and Incremental Adoption of Explicit PvDs ... > PvD-aware nodes shall treat betwork information from different > interfaces, which is not identified as belonging explicitly to some > PvD, as belonging to separate PvDs, one per interface.
s/betwork/network/ > 3.2. Securing PvD Information > > > DHCPv6 and RAs both provide some form of authentication to ensure the > identity of the source as well as the integrity of the secured > message content. While this is useful, determining authenticity does > tell a node whether the configuration source is actually allowed to > provide information from a given PvD. Presumably "does" in the second sentence is intended to be "does not". > 3.4. Selective Propagation The abbreviation "ORO" is used but not defined. Brian _______________________________________________ mif mailing list mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif