Hi Scott,
Not at all. I’m not opposed to verifiable ID to board airplanes. I do wonder why a rather basic ID plan had to take decades to develop and implement, why that implementation has so many excuses and loopholes, and why, if the project has some real benefits (which I believe it does) these couldn’t be better articulated. If REAL ID was worth doing at all, it was worth doing so that it can succeed. The writer of the piece I shared has his own ideas on whether it’s a good idea, but he also describes a scenario wherein it just doesn’t work. I’m also not opposed to the TSA, largely because I vividly recall the many shortcomings of the pre-TSA “system” (if such it can be called). I do fault the TSA for flawed implementation (which has also persisted for over 20 years) and many other sins, not the least of these being its use as a political tool by whichever group occupies the “Big House” at a given time. In sum, I suppose I just don’t like poor planning, sloppy implementation, and political agendas. Such are my personality flaws. All the best, DW David Wardell (757) 561-0582 <mailto:da...@wardell.org> da...@wardell.org <https://wardell.us/url/b5s86> <https://wardell.us/url/s9qvz> From: F. Scott Wilson via Mifnet <mifnet@lists.mifnet.com> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2025 10:49 PM To: mifnet@lists.mifnet.com Cc: dward...@mifnet.com; mifnet@lists.mifnet.com; F. Scott Wilson <fscottwil...@icloud.com> Subject: [Mifnet 🚀 72447] Re: REAL ID Day After-Action Report: Stalemate - AEI 20250514 So, Dr Wardell, are you opposed to a national ID for airplane access? Scott On May 19, 2025, at 10:42 PM, David Wardell via Mifnet <mifnet@lists.mifnet.com <mailto:mifnet@lists.mifnet.com> > wrote:  <https://www.aei.org/technology-and-innovation/real-id-day-after-action-report-stalemate/?mkt_tok=NDc1LVBCUS05NzEAAAGabdrO2XA7nUMzzuGJdTLRCI8XaNCu79rxd93G9QGTkmDubKzwpMPXvno8tP_r9w9aL8KYVI2KMS2ODPmCkx0zhMqfho85MZXqMS5wb4y0p3WEpiA> https://www.aei.org/technology-and-innovation/real-id-day-after-action-report-stalemate/ I’ll observe that I was at the very first post-9/11 TSA meetings where something like REAL ID was discussed. It’s been rattling around in the box for over 20 years. David Wardell (757) 561-0582 <mailto:da...@wardell.org> da...@wardell.org <https://wardell.us/url/b5s86> <https://wardell.us/url/b5s86> <image001.png> <https://wardell.us/url/s9qvz> <https://wardell.us/url/s9qvz> <image002.png> _____ By Jim Harper AEIdeas D-Day is more than just the glorious day that began the end of World War II. It is the general term for any major military operation, along with H-Hour and perhaps M-Minute in cyber war. Here’s my report from a curious move in our nation’s War on Terror: REAL ID Day. On May 7, 2025, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) was scheduled to attack American air travel. Terrorism works by inducing overreaction from victim states. So, yes, the TSA’s work to restrict travel by law-abiding Americans gives a win to the 9/11 attackers, nearly a quarter-century on. No doing business in other states, no visiting the new grandbaby—unless you have enrolled in the national ID system created by the REAL ID Act. But the attack didn’t come. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem <https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/06/kristi-noem-real-id-deadline-00331397> announced the day before that American travelers would not be turned away. As The Wall Street Journal’s travel columnist reported, <https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/travel/real-id-first-day-air-travel-airports-8eb137ca> lines were shorter at many airports. My experience flying on May 9 without a federally compliant ID was smooth. I decline <https://www.cato.org/blog/tsa-strip-search-machines> strip-search machines, so I already get a pat-down (or “freedom massage”) each time I fly, which is probably what travelers with noncompliant IDs got. That was not an abject loss for the agency. As it has done so many times before, it abandoned its improvised deadline, but it did so later and less clearly than before. Many people still operate under the impression that they must show a federally compliant license at TSA checkpoints. That belief represents a significant gain for the national ID project. But that gain comes at a cost. DHS has adopted an interpretation of the REAL ID Act that is unsupported by its text. Any expansion of the national ID system through such means represents overstretch that could lead to collapse. Let’s review the dynamics of that overstretch. A year ago, I <https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/real-id-deadline-will-never-arrive/678370/> predicted ( <https://www.aei.org/technology-and-innovation/no-the-real-id-deadline-is-not-in-one-year/> twice) that the REAL ID deadline would not arrive. On May 6, with the deadline apparently impending, an NPR interviewer <https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2025/05/06/real-id-flight-travel-states-airport> asked me (not unkindly) what to make of the deadline’s arrival. (My part of the program starts at about minute 27.) REAL ID deadlines have always fallen because the statute requires DHS to determine states’ compliance or non-compliance. If DHS deems a state noncompliant, TSA must turn away all travelers from that state—whether they have a federally compliant ID or not. That prospect is untenable, so the deadlines have always been postponed. When Congress passed the REAL ID Act two decades ago and DHS fleshed out its details, states under leadership from both major parties resisted. The <https://www.cato.org/blog/what-real-real-id-compliance> burdens of actual full compliance are massive, numerous, and onerous. State leaders expressed concern with the cost of this unfunded federal mandate and their constituents’ privacy and data security. To create the appearance of progress and bring recalcitrant states on board, DHS routinely declared states compliant despite their failure to meet all statutory requirements. DHS retreated to pared-down “compliance factors,” eventually declaring all states compliant, even though they are not. But this has the DHS and TSA in a box. With all states officially “compliant,” there is no cause to turn away any traveler. So the agency began threatening to refuse travelers who lack federally compliant IDs. On NPR, I <https://www.aei.org/Users/JimHa/Downloads/All%20this%20I%20explained,%20awkwardly,%20perhaps,%20on%20NPR> talked a lot about the weakness of identity-based security against significant threats. Eliminating REAL ID would have essentially no impact on national security, and it would improve our overall welfare. Congress should repeal it. In the coming weeks and months, travelers without federally compliant IDs will be able to access air travel. Selectively, perhaps, some travelers without REAL IDs will be turned away for saying the wrong thing to a TSA supervisor, for traveling while black, or some other unknown reason. This is the stuff of irregular government procedures. So far, only one print reporter I know has <https://www.savannahnow.com/story/news/2025/05/07/savannahs-driver-services-location-has-had-increased-processing-for-real-ids-since-march/83471410007/> read the REAL ID statute to see whether TSA is acting consistently with the authority Congress gave it. But one of those cases will open up the TSA to the lawsuit that collapses its national ID plans. A little focus on what the statute does from a judge trained to apply statutes as written will produce a ruling showing that TSA does not have the authority to turn travelers from compliant states away from airports. I count it as a stalemate. The TSA’s moderate advance on REAL ID Day foretells collapse, sooner or later, of the national ID project. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Revised: 20250507 You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list. The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please know that it would be greatly appreciated: https://wardell.us/url/mifbit All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies: 1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a right. 2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author. 3) The tone of discussions is collegial. 4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste. 5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other Mifnet members. * The Mifnet WEB SITE is: https://www.mifnet.com/ * To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit: https://lists.mifnet.com/ OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: mifnet-requ...@lists.mifnet.com?subject=leave <mailto:mifnet-requ...@lists.mifnet.com?subject=leave> * Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to: mifnet@lists.mifnet.com <mailto:mifnet@lists.mifnet.com> * You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at: mifnet-ow...@lists.mifnet.com <mailto:mifnet-ow...@lists.mifnet.com> * Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list traffic into 1-3 messages daily. See instructions at: https://lists.mifnet.com/ * Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at: https://lists.mifnet.com/ * For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: mifnet-requ...@lists.mifnet.com?subject=help <mailto:mifnet-requ...@lists.mifnet.com?subject=help> * View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at: https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies * View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at: https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems * View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at: https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/mifnet@lists.mifnet.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Revised: 20250507 You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list. The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please know that it would be greatly appreciated: https://wardell.us/url/mifbit All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies: 1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a right. 2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author. 3) The tone of discussions is collegial. 4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste. 5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other Mifnet members. * The Mifnet WEB SITE is: https://www.mifnet.com/ * To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit: https://lists.mifnet.com/ OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: mifnet-requ...@lists.mifnet.com?subject=leave * Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to: mifnet@lists.mifnet.com * You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at: mifnet-ow...@lists.mifnet.com * Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list traffic into 1-3 messages daily. See instructions at: https://lists.mifnet.com/ * Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at: https://lists.mifnet.com/ * For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: mifnet-requ...@lists.mifnet.com?subject=help * View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at: https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies * View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at: https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems * View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at: https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/mifnet@lists.mifnet.com/
