Shared by way of information and without further comment. The piece includes a quote from Mifnet friend Gary Leff.
David Wardell (757) 561-0582 <mailto:da...@wardell.org> da...@wardell.org <https://wardell.us/url/b5s86> <https://wardell.us/url/s9qvz> _____ https://reason.com/2025/06/05/nathan-fielders-737-stunt-involved-elaborate-w orkaround-of-ridiculous-1500-hour-rule/ In the season finale of the HBO show The Rehearsal, comedian Nathan Fielder flew a fully loaded Boeing 737 to test his novel idea that fatal plane crashes could be prevented by creating better interpersonal communication between pilots and first officers. In keeping with the show's premise, Fielder wanted to make his dry-run test as close to a real-life commercial airliner flight as possible-complete with a cabin full of passengers. This naturally required Fielder to obtain a commercial pilot's license and buy (with HBO's money) a 737. Neither is particularly easy, but it is relatively straightforward from a legal perspective. Flying with passengers, however, required Fielder to engage in an elaborate workaround of federal regulations that were, ironically enough, adopted as the last bright idea to prevent plane crashes. Following the <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colgan_Air_Flight_3407> Colgan Air disaster in 2009, when a commercial airliner crashed in New York, killing 50 people, Congress passed legislation requiring that pilots have 1,500 hours of flight time before qualifying for the Air Transport Pilot license. The previous requirement had been 250 hours. As detailed in the show, this created a problem for Fielder, who, in the run-up to the filming of his first 737 flight, had only accumulated a few hundred hours of flight time. To get around this hurdle, Fielder exploited a loophole in the law that allowed him to carry hired actors posing as paying customers. People can argue about whether Fielder's theory of plane crashes, and his proposed fix of having pilots and co-pilots act out a brief scene of them bluntly confronting each other before flights, will actually improve aviation safety. Rep. Steven Cohen (D-Tenn.), the ranking member of the House's Transportation Subcommittee on Aviation, was hilariously uninterested in the idea during his meeting with Fielder earlier in the season. In a recent Wall Street Journal article, pilots' and aviation experts' <https://www.wsj.com/arts-culture/television/nathan-fielder-the-rehearsal-se ason-2-pilots-fe059336?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAiDEKMB1D9fOX0_-k33SUFoQjVhkzZ ZQUxDZ13-HjBFmDmndakJoxPp_tuC6Xw%3D&gaa_ts=6841c9a7&gaa_sig=OoJGSkuK03QzqJdQ X_B5_Z1XMT5Ekm8sk9TQcyZUH4XGrv4bxx6w0M4OFEhowjrCBxt0G9IGFMltlzT9AJAxtA%3D%3D > assessment of Fielder's idea ranged from minimally supportive to openly disdainful. Many people interviewed by the Journal stressed that pilots already do a lot of role-playing and situational training to improve in-flight communication. What can be said for Fielder's idea is that it would be at least as effective as the 1,500-hour rule (which is to say, not at all) and much less costly. No <https://reason.com/2023/06/16/senate-democrats-say-modernizing-airline-pilo t-training-requirements-will-kill-people/> other country in the world requires airline pilots to rack up as much flight time as the U.S. currently does. Neither the Federal Aviation Administration (which regulates aviation safety) nor the National Transportation Safety Board (which investigates crashes) <https://viewfromthewing.com/how-the-1500-hour-rule-to-become-a-commercial-p ilot-compromises-safety/> has found any relationship between the 1,500-hour rule and improved safety. (The two pilots in the Colgan disaster notably had over 1,500 hours of experience each.) Critics charge that the 1,500-hour rule reduces safety by forcing pilots to spend endless hours performing routine flights at the expense of time spent training in more productive simulators. Regional airlines <https://reason.com/2023/06/16/senate-democrats-say-modernizing-airline-pilo t-training-requirements-will-kill-people/> complain that it's made recruiting pilots much more difficult, leading to a shortage of pilots and reduced regional airline service. Nevertheless, efforts to reform the 1,500-hour rule have run into concerted opposition from the country's main pilots' union, the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), and their Democratic allies in Congress. President Donald Trump's <https://viewfromthewing.com/trumps-faa-nominee-challenged-the-1500-hour-rul e-for-pilots-now-hes-in-the-unions-crosshairs/> pending nominee for head of the FAA, Bryan Bedford, has proven exceptionally controversial because of his own pushback against the regulation. Gary Leff, who writes the View From the Wing blog, <https://viewfromthewing.com/trumps-faa-nominee-challenged-the-1500-hour-rul e-for-pilots-now-hes-in-the-unions-crosshairs/> suggests crass self-interest motivates ALPA's support for the 1,500-hour rule. The regulation makes it harder to become a pilot and, therefore, helps push up pilots' wages. ALPA has been sharply critical of Fiedler's own proposed safety improvements, saying in a statement to the Journal that crew communications training is "built on decades of research, training, and real-world experience-not fictional TV shows or comedy routines." As off-the-wall as Fielder's idea might be, it's not inherently more ridiculous than the ineffective hours regulation that ALPA has spent so much time defending.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Revised: 20250507 You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list. The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please know that it would be greatly appreciated: https://wardell.us/url/mifbit All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies: 1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a right. 2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author. 3) The tone of discussions is collegial. 4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste. 5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other Mifnet members. * The Mifnet WEB SITE is: https://www.mifnet.com/ * To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit: https://lists.mifnet.com/ OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: mifnet-requ...@lists.mifnet.com?subject=leave * Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to: mifnet@lists.mifnet.com * You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at: mifnet-ow...@lists.mifnet.com * Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list traffic into 1-3 messages daily. See instructions at: https://lists.mifnet.com/ * Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at: https://lists.mifnet.com/ * For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: mifnet-requ...@lists.mifnet.com?subject=help * View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at: https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies * View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at: https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems * View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at: https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/mifnet@lists.mifnet.com/
