Brilliantly written but, like Tom W, I have more chance of getting my head 
round the plot lines of Christopher Nolan's films*. (At least Tom studied this 
stuff).Simon(*Except Dunkirk. I followed that one).
-------- Original message --------From: Tom Windmuller via Mifnet 
<[email protected]> Date: 06/10/2025  07:58  (GMT+00:00) To: 
[email protected] Cc: Tom Windmuller <[email protected]> Subject: 
[Mifnet đź›° 74414]  Re: NNN What Time Is It? (It's Later Than You Think) Thank 
you, David.  Unfortunately, I understood almost as much of your description of 
General Relativity today as when Professors Hans Bethe & David Mermin tried to 
explain it to me at university over 50 years ago.   I got a D- in the course 
back then; would probably get an F today.   Glad my life took a different 
direction than into science.  All best wishes,tomOn Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 06:26 
David Wardell via Mifnet <[email protected]> wrote:"Now he has departed 
from this strange world a little ahead of me. That signifies nothing. For those 
of us who believe in physics, the distinction between past, present and future 
is only a stubbornly persistent illusion." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955), 
German Theoretical Physicist    This is the statement by Einstein that is oft 
misquoted to say, "Time is an illusion." Apart from the variance between the 
misquote and the original, we are faced with the problem that one cannot be 
sure what he meant.  Einstein wrote the above lines in a private letter to the 
family of a close friend who had just died. We assume he intended it by way of 
condolence. People have been arguing about the meaning since the statement 
began circulating.  The notion that time is an illusion isn't new. There is 
even a quite legitimate and credible paper, written many years ago, which 
argues that, simply from a logical perspective, time does not exist.  We know 
that time does exist (or we believe that we know) because we define it as the 
inevitable progression from past to present, and then to future. We sequence 
our lives to harmonize with our observations, and we synchronize our clocks so 
that we may coordinate with other humans as well. While this process works 
reliably across the sequence of events that we observe, there are some flaws 
that we overlook because they are beyond our experience. For example, there is 
no means by which we can perceive “now.” Indeed, there is no definition of “the 
present” that works in all situations. Although we assume that “now” is what we 
are currently experiencing, we are continually living only with what has gone 
before. Our eyes perceive light that is reflected by objects within our field 
of vision. Even though the interval is very small, our perception is 
nonetheless delayed because light does not propagate instantly. Further, our 
visual perception must be transmitted to our brains (a much slower process) and 
understood, based upon how much attention we may be paying (still more time). 
Beyond this, we know that time exists because General Relativity teaches us 
that time is an integral part of our understanding of space and matter. 
Accordingly, space and time are relative, and in some respects, they are the 
same. According to General relativity, every point in space associates with a 
point in time. Massive objects distort space, and we experience this as 
gravity. Such distortions also affect time. All this can be observed consistent 
with the predictions of General Relativity.  One of those predictions (also 
confirmed by observation) is that time is perceived differently based upon the 
observer’s frame of reference. Hence, there is no “now” that can apply to all 
observers in all situations. An extreme example may illustrate how this works: 
We know that “black holes” exist (they have been observed more than once), and 
these result from extreme effects of gravity distortions. Such distortions 
cause the passing of time to slow for observers in a different frame of 
reference. The effects of gravity beyond what is called the “event horizon” of 
a black hole are so extreme that no form of matter or energy can escape. The 
effect of a black hole on time would manifest in a way would prevent an 
external observer from ever seeing an object cross the event horizon. The 
passing of time would become so distorted that it would effectively cease, 
making observations of objects crossing the event horizon impossible, as this 
would require infinite time. It is not time that is an illusion, it is our 
perceptions of time.  We insist, even unconsciously, that all things must have 
a beginning, as this is our experience. Most interpretations of current physics 
(although there is disagreement here) require that existence has a beginning.  
General Relativity can be interpreted to say that all the universe may be 
understood as a box, bounded by the three spatial dimensions and a fourth 
dimension of time. Existence is defined as whatever is inside the box.  To 
continue the "black hole" example, General Relativity suggests that, were it 
possible for an observer to look outward from past the event horizon (this 
could never happen), said observer could view the entire history of the 
universe from beginning to end, owing to the extreme distortions of time by 
gravity.  General Relativity does not of itself, however, make predictions 
which require a beginning of existence. It primarily describes the relationship 
between matter, energy, space, and time. Still, inconsistencies remain. General 
Relativity is not consistent with quantum mechanics, one instance being that 
the latter requires that there must be a fixed definition of "now." It has been 
known since quantum mechanics was first defined that our understanding of it is 
flawed (or at least incomplete). Much thought and energy continue to be 
expended to develop a theory that reconciles our understanding of existence at 
all levels and that resolves such inconsistencies.  Yet, incomplete though our 
understanding may be, the predictions of our theories work well enough to 
enable truly astounding technologies, which demand the measurement of time 
intervals with extreme precision. We synchronize our clocks so that 
contemporary society and technology can function. One basic unit of our time 
calculation is the second, which is defined by atomic clocks measuring a given 
number of microwave oscillations of cesium atoms. We then align seconds with 
other standards, to include minutes, hours, days, and so on. Unfortunately, 
this process is not without its flaws. Human society has grown comfortable 
(over thousands of years) with synchronizing time to astronomical events. We 
divide years into days required for the earth to circle the sun. Days are 
further grouped into months, which are loosely derived from the phases of the 
moon and early lunar calendars. Days are also grouped into weeks, which are a 
logical construct without an astronomical parallel. Days are defined in various 
ways—coordinating these can be challenging. For most, a day is the time 
required for earth to rotate on its axis relative to the sun. As this 
definition is difficult to precisely measure in practice, a different 
definition uses sidereal reckoning based upon the apparent motion of stars. The 
fixed definition of a day, relative to what is known as International Atomic 
Time (TAI), as measured by atomic clocks, is 86,400 TAI seconds. The 
astronomical definition adopted in the 1950s defines a second as a fraction of 
a sidereal year. The length of a day based upon earth’s rotation varies 
considerably over long time periods. Over the last 53 years the length of the 
astronomical day has been increasing, which has necessitated the periodic 
announcements of “leap seconds” which preserve the coordination of an 
astronomical day with TAI. Two leap second updates annually are possible, with 
the accumulated change enacted by all such leap seconds now totaling 27 seconds 
since 1972.Not everyone is happy with leap seconds. Software errors occur 
periodically as systems (including airlines) that incorporate time coordination 
do not update correctly, or are not designed to accommodate leap seconds at 
all. The most straightforward solution to this challenge would be for all 
systems to simply align with TAI and ignore alignment to astronomical time. The 
U.S. GPS standard does not recognize leap seconds, while those of some other 
countries do. Current international proposals call for relaxing leap second 
requirements beginning in 2035—which would allow a larger variance to 
accumulate before considering an adjustment. This is partly owing to a recently 
observed increase in earth’s rotation speed, which may require a negative leap 
second sometime before 2035.If the reader is wondering, there are theories, but 
no one really knows why earth’s rotation speed changes. The most compelling 
speculations center on changes in the earth’s molten core.Thus, we see that 
there remains no universal definition of “now” and the agreed conventions we 
employ to coordinate time are not so agreeable as we may assume. Was Einstein 
right? Time will tell. Old Man WardellFailed Mad Scientist David Wardell(757) 
[email protected]   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised: 20250507

You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list.

The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly 
cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please 
know that it would be greatly appreciated:
https://wardell.us/url/mifbit

All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies:

1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a 
right.
2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author.
3) The tone of discussions is collegial.
4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste.
5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other 
Mifnet members.

* The Mifnet WEB SITE is:
  https://www.mifnet.com/

* To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/
  OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: [email protected]?subject=leave

* Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to:
  [email protected]

* You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at:
  [email protected]

* Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list 
traffic into 1-3
  messages daily. See instructions at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email:
  [email protected]?subject=help

* View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies

* View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems

* View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised: 20250507

You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list.

The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly 
cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please 
know that it would be greatly appreciated:
https://wardell.us/url/mifbit

All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies:

1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a 
right.
2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author.
3) The tone of discussions is collegial.
4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste.
5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other 
Mifnet members.

* The Mifnet WEB SITE is:
  https://www.mifnet.com/

* To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/
  OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: [email protected]?subject=leave

* Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to:
  [email protected]

* You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at:
  [email protected]

* Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list 
traffic into 1-3
  messages daily. See instructions at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email:
  [email protected]?subject=help

* View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies

* View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems

* View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/

Reply via email to