Schiphol Flight Cap Not Valid, Dutch High Court Rules
SHARE
Helen Massy-Beresford
<https://aviationweek.com/author/helen-massy-beresford> March 11, 2026
[image: KLM flights taking off at Schiphol]

KLM flights taking off at Schiphol.
Credit: Imago/Alamy
The Dutch Council of State has overturned a flight cap imposed at Amsterdam
Airport Schiphol, saying the Netherlands government did not properly draft
the decree that brought the cap into law and did not provide adequate
reasons for it.

The Council of State issued its ruling March 11, in the latest step in a
long-running attempt to put measures in place to reduce noise at the
airport, one of Europe’s busiest.

A first attempt by the government to impose a flight cap met with a
backlash from the aviation industry, and the government had to reverse
course and follow the balanced approach procedure. Under European Union
law, member states must follow the balanced approach procedure when they
want to reduce airport noise.

That procedure eventually led to the introduction into law of a flight cap
of 478,000 flight movements per year, through an Airport Traffic Decree
(ATD). Behind the scenes, however, a legal challenge to the cap was taking
place.

A spokesperson for the Council of State, the country’s highest court, said
before the ruling that its verdict could not be appealed.

“The minister of infrastructure and water management did not carefully
draft the [ATD] for Schiphol, which limited the number of flights, and did
not provide adequate reasons for it. Therefore, the decision cannot be
upheld,” the Council of State said.

Airlines, local residents, municipalities and associations had appealed the
ATD for various reasons. Carriers objected to the flight restrictions, and
surrounding municipalities, environmental organizations and local residents
wanted a further restriction due to noise pollution.

“In the opinion of the Administrative Jurisdiction Division, the minister
has not adequately substantiated his decision. According to the minister,
the established maximum number of flights should therefore serve as a limit
for noise exposure. However, that limit can change, because a maximum
number of flights does not establish the maximum noise exposure,” the
Council of State said.

“Not every aircraft produces the same amount of noise, so the sum of
flights alone does not sufficiently reflect the total amount of noise that
may be produced in a year,” the council added.

The ruling also stated that the minister had not made it clear that the
amended traffic decree would lead to a reduction in noise pollution for
residents near the airport, which was the original purpose of the decree.

The ruling annuls the latest ATD that saw the flight cap pass into law,
which means that the previous decree from 2008 remains in place. This
decree does not specify a maximum number of flights per year.

However, the annulled decree included a reduction in the maximum number of
night flights to 27,000 from 32,000. As none of the parties objected to
that part of the decision, an interim ruling now stipulates that limit.

The cabinet is currently preparing a comprehensive amendment to the ATD,
and the interim measure will expire once that comes into effect, the
Council of State said.

The Netherlands' flag carrier KLM Royal Dutch Airlines said: “KLM has taken
note of the ruling by the Council of State, in which the expedited Schiphol
[ATD] has been annulled. This decision confirms that a legally robust and
careful approach is necessary for all parties involved.”

Noting the need to "study the ruling" prior to commenting in detail, the
Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management said: "The ruling further
underscores the importance of the larger revision of the [ATD] that we sent
to parliament earlier this year. With that ATD, we will resolve the legal
foundation for Schiphol Airport."

A Schiphol Airport spokesperson echoed the ministry's intention to “study
the ruling carefully," saying the air hub “will consult with the Ministry
of Infrastructure and Water Management to understand what it means for the
airport and the number of flights.”

“Schiphol, local residents and the aviation sector need clarity and legal
certainty about the rules," the spokesperson said, adding that it is
important for the new ATD process to continue.

“Such a decree provides a legal basis for Schiphol’s operations,
strengthens the position of local residents and enables further reductions
in noise and disturbance. The points raised by the Council of State can be
incorporated by the minister in that process.”
https://aviationweek.com/air-transport/airports-networks/schiphol-flight-cap-not-valid-dutch-high-court-rules?utm_rid=CPEN1000015162531&utm_campaign=61621&utm_medium=email&elq2=9af2b6d65f9a4c51b46bddf1f39da61e&utm_emailname=AW_News_AirTransportDigest_NL_03122026&sp_eh=d1d931830654649b8b9157e41e424fa9c0abc2de614473733babc4db97f2de86

<https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/>
>>
>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised: 20250507

You are receiving The Mifnet because you requested to join this list.

The Mifnet is largely a labor of love, however the infrastructure isn't exactly 
cost-free. If you'd care to make a small contribution to the effort, please 
know that it would be greatly appreciated:
https://wardell.us/url/mifbit

All posts sent to the list should abide by these policies:

1) List members acknowledge that participation in Mifnet is a privilege--not a 
right.
2) Posts are always off the record, absent specific permission from the author.
3) The tone of discussions is collegial.
4) Posts are expected to be in reasonably good taste.
5) We discuss ideas and not personalities, and we don't speak ill of other 
Mifnet members.

* The Mifnet WEB SITE is:
  https://www.mifnet.com/

* To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list at any time please visit:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/
  OR: SEND THIS MESSAGE via email: [email protected]?subject=leave

* Send Mifnet mailing list POSTS/SUBMISSIONS to:
  [email protected]

* You may reach the person managing The Mifnet at:
  [email protected]

* Please consider the DIGEST version of The Mifnet, which consolidates all list 
traffic into 1-3
  messages daily. See instructions at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* Manage your personal Mifnet SUBSCRIPTION at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/

* For a list of all available Mifnet commands, SEND THIS MESSAGE via email:
  [email protected]?subject=help

* View The Mifnet LIST POLICIES and PRIVACY POLICY at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/policies

* View instructions for Mifnet DELIVERY PROBLEMS at:
  https://mifnet.com/index.php/delivery-problems

* View The Mifnet LIST ARCHIVE at:
  https://lists.mifnet.com/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/

Reply via email to