Hi Emily,

 

As you suggested and further to my discussion with Nazir, Selim and Lassaad, it 
was adopted the following: the If loan schedule independent of meeting schedule 
is turned on, interest deducted at disbursement will be disabled.

 

The functional specification has been updated accordingly: 
http://www.mifos.org/developers/wiki/LoanIndependentOfMeeting  

 

Regards.

 

_____________________________________________________________________

Mss Nesrine MADHKOUR

Finance Solutions Consultant

 

OXIA

OXIA is ISO 9001 V2000 certified company - AFAQ QUAL/2005/25140

 

11, Rue Claude Bernard
1002 Tunis Belvédère
Tunisia

 

Tel.: +216 71 28 27 00 

Fax: +216 71 28 27 05

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Skype : NesrineMadhkour

www.oxiasoft.com <http://www.oxiasoft.com/> 

 

________________________________

De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Emily Tucker
Envoyé : mercredi 20 février 2008 19:05
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Aliya Walji
Cc : Mifos functional discussions
Objet : Re: [Mifos-functional] ENDA-Mifos: Loan schedule independent ofmeeting 
schedule_Functional issue

 

Comments in Purple  (sorry, I know this is bad mailing list etiquette)

         

         

        To analyse this issue, I have created 4 loan products to simulate 
different scenarios related to the loan schedule start date calculation (On a 
previous version of Mifos before implementing the loan schedule independent of 
meeting schedule feature):

         

        1/ A loan which interests are not deducted at disbursement: the first 
repayment date is different from the loan disbursement date.

        2/ A loan which interests are not deducted at disbursement but on which 
fees deducted at disbursement are applied: the first repayment date is also 
different from the loan disbursement date.

        3/ A loan which interests are deducted at disbursement: the first 
repayment date is the same as the loan disbursement date.

        4/ A loan which interests are deducted at disbursement and on which 
fees deducted at disbursement are applied: the first repayment date is the same 
as the loan disbursement date. 

         

        >A question:

        >We also have fees that can be charged at time of disbursal.  Does the 
scenario you describe below also apply then?

         

        Based on the above cases, it is obvious that fees applicable to loans 
and deducted at disbursement don't follow the same logic of interests when 
calculating the loan schedule start date. 

         

        Nesrine,

         

        Thanks for doing this analysis!  I've added a link to this email thread 
to this section of the functional spec:

        http://mifos.org/knowledge/functional-specs/loans#repayment-schedule

         

        We will be updating the spec for v1.1, and will include clarifications 
around the scenarios you just researched.  

         

         

        >My recommendation would be the following:

        >If "interest deducted at disbursement" is ON, then the system should 
consider the second payment as the "first repayment" and apply the logic for 
scheduling the date of the payment accordingly.  In some ways-- >it really is 
the first repayment-- albeit only of principal

         

        As a reminder: when implementing "loan schedule independent of meeting 
schedule", we allow disbursal to happen on a non meeting day. However, if 
interests deducted at disbursement attribute is turned on, and if we keep the 
same logic which is having the first repayment date the same as the disbursal 
date, we will have a loan schedule start date different from the loan repayment 
days. That is why I think that we should keep the same loan schedule start date 
whether interest deducted at disbursement are applicable or not. I.e the loan 
schedule start date is the first meeting from the disbursal date (which defined 
on the feature specifications). 

        The only difference between having interest deducted at disbursement or 
not will be obvious actually only at disbursement (The amount of payment 
details on the disbursal page).

         

        Moreover, I think that if we consider the second payment as "the first 
repayment" as recommended, min and max (especially max) window wouldn't have 
any sense. The calculation of the loan schedule start date would be the same as 
if we have a grace period of one instalment.

         

        So I'm not sure if I fully followed this. :-)  What I think you're 
recommending is this:

        (*) The "Start Date" for loan schedules (regarldess of whether or not 
interest is collected at disbursement) should be the first repayment *after* 
the disbursal date. (Above you mention that it should be the first meeting 
after the disbursal date, but if we have loan schedule independent of meeting, 
shouldn't it be the first repayment date?)

         

        (*) If this happens, then the system would apply all the configurations 
used to determine the next repayment day to that first repayment after the 
disbursal date-- ignoring the interest paid at disbursement.

        (*) There would be other impacts too... for example, if a loan is 
defined to have 10 installments-- then the repayment of interest would not be 
considered an installment. instead, the loan would have 10 principal repayments.

         

        I actually think this is the right approach and I don't like the fact 
that Mifos currently considers the interest deduction as the "first 
installment". However, I'm worried that this change is actually a very 
significant change in the system.  There's a lot of logic to think through-- 
things like:

        (*) How would the UI change on the Loan Repayment Schedule?

        (*) Would there be any impact on how grace periods are handled 
(probably not, but would have to research)

        (*) And probably a lot of other issues I haven't thought of

         

        I'm worried at making such a significant change given everything else 
we're trying to do in this release.  It seems very high-risk.  I'm wondering if 
there is an easier approach? 

         

        Right now,very few of the MFIs we've spoken with use "interest deducted 
at disbursement".  So if it's easier and if Enda doesn't need this feature, I 
think it's OK if we disable "loan schedule independent of meeting schedule" if 
interest is deducted at disbursement.  Would that be easier to implement?

         

        Do you have any other ideas?

         

        Nesrine-- I know you need to close out on this issue quickly-- so feel 
free to IM me if you need to discuss this verbally.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Mifos-functional mailing list
Mifos-functional@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-functional

Reply via email to