> Given that, my suggestion is that we actually try to keep the logic around > the redo-pipeline at a minimum. The loan defaults are primarily there to > help loan officers disburse the right amount. But if the wrong amount was > disbursed-- the admin will need a way to enter the correct amount-- even > if that is different from the mix/max of the loan cycle.
Given that, what defaults do you propose we use? Do you propose that for the redo loan pipeline there are no min/max/defaults displayed or enforced at all for number of installments and loan amounts? > I'm assuming, though, that this pipeline uses the other defaults specified > in the product definition? I wouldn't make an assumption because the two features were not designed to work together. I have no idea what defaults it would come up with for loan products that have defaults based on previous amounts or loan cycle. My best guess is that it would base things on the current loan cycle or current loan amount for the client and then set the defaults for the redo loan pipeline based on those - but who knows? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Mifos-functional mailing list Mifos-functional@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mifos-functional
